You speak as though you expect the answer to your question to be yes--that everyone here is willing to open up their wounds for everyone to see, that that will be universally helpful and healing and unifying rather than potentially much more damaging to some people or even to all.
It seems cruel to me. I doubt that was your intention. But not everyone is capable of trust. Even working on the assumption that everyone on this team is worth trusting, that it would be physically and psychologically safe for everyone to open up in that way, not everyone is capable of doing so. Not everyone wants to. Not everyone will be truthful about doing so. The people who tell the truth and receive negative or ignorant reactions about their truth will fester resentment.
Asking for universal honesty is artificial. People open up at their own pace and on their own terms. Again, I don't feel you meant harm in any way, and the initiative is admirable, but I feel the response you'll get will be heavily skewed towards the people who were comfortable being open anyway.
un; harmonia
It seems cruel to me. I doubt that was your intention. But not everyone is capable of trust. Even working on the assumption that everyone on this team is worth trusting, that it would be physically and psychologically safe for everyone to open up in that way, not everyone is capable of doing so. Not everyone wants to. Not everyone will be truthful about doing so. The people who tell the truth and receive negative or ignorant reactions about their truth will fester resentment.
Asking for universal honesty is artificial. People open up at their own pace and on their own terms. Again, I don't feel you meant harm in any way, and the initiative is admirable, but I feel the response you'll get will be heavily skewed towards the people who were comfortable being open anyway.