ex_adept136: (Default)
佐々木 琲世 ([personal profile] ex_adept136) wrote in [community profile] futurology2017-04-25 08:10 pm

text | un: Sasaki

[Haise has talked with several teammates about the lack of cohesion, and how difficult it is for all of them to coordinate. It was something he'd meant to discuss, or perhaps encourage others better suited, to bring up when they had some down-time. In the wake of a rather heated debate he chose to sat out on, he thinks maybe conversations about how they unify can't wait]

It seems that some of us may be feeling a little hot under the collar after recent events. Since I am an advocate for mercy, and am only alive because as much was extended to me when others may have argued against it, I don't want to touch on moral disagreements. Our stances will naturally differ, because our organization doesn't give us any unifying principles to abide by.

As a member of the CCG, I had very set guidelines to follow. Those weren't all things I agreed with, or felt right about. But they did maintain order, and did keep people safe. They made us an effective team, and more than once it's come up with colleagues here that we might benefit from that.

This was something I'd hoped might come up on Oska, when people had time to relax, but considering the circumstances...

Would any of you be interested in opening that discussion? That is, talking about our backgrounds, where we're coming from, and what we believe. If we start there, surely we can find a way to work together. If we're constantly at odds with one another, that isn't good for anyone. When I first joined, that division was certainly in place, but those I disagreed with still took the time to speak with me, and we did have common ground. I'd like to suggest that, as a team, we try to find that...for all our sakes.

Edit: Although I spoke of my own background in the example I provided, by no means am I suggesting that everyone do the same. Most importantly, we need to establish where we stand on issues we're often confronted with in our line of work. These things would inevitably show in our actions, so speaking on personal matters is not necessary for discussion.
What each of us believes and what course we're inclined to take is what I mean to inquire about.


[ooc: Naturally, thread-hop/jack as desired]
strictdiscipline: (013)

text; un. hawkeye

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2017-04-27 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You aren't defined by the actions of your people, though it seems as though you've realized that already.

[But perhaps of more interest:]

You hold a very positive opinion of your place here, and it seems of ALASTAIR by proxy.
secondnature: (bro bro time)

[personal profile] secondnature 2017-04-27 05:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Trust me, I know. You met me the first time when I was looking like one of them. I don't THINK that's possible. But it doesn't really matter to me now. I've met good Galra. And if I'm anything like a Galra, it's guys like that.

[He's made peace with it. And he's even worked on his issues with Allura. Hunk had noticed more happiness within Keith, and he hadn't been wrong. Having some answers and certainty about his identity helps. More than that, it's knowing what he's meant to be doing.]

A lot of people think it's strange. I remember what you've said about your place here. Do you not think we're doing good? [He doesn't reiterate what she said about not mattering enough to go home. But he remembers it just the same.]
strictdiscipline: (090)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2017-04-29 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
[It's strange mostly in comparison to others she's met, people who've been around far longer and still hold distrust for ALASTAIR. (She supposes she can see why they think as they do, even if it's not a sentiment she shares.)]

It would depend on your definition of 'good' I assume. [Not that she's really here to get into technicalities, and she breezes past that comment quick enough.] I think we're doing what needs to be done, and as far as I can tell our actions seem to have done more good than bad.

But I'm also a soldier. My viewpoint will always be different from many others.

[Sometimes people have to get their hands dirty. Sometimes deaths are a necessary consequence.]
secondnature: (i am serious)

[personal profile] secondnature 2017-04-30 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't call myself a soldier. Maybe if I had stayed in school I'd be considered one, but things are different as a paladin. And as a part of the team. I've had the freedom to figure out what it is that I want to do.

Can you really say that you're still a soldier while you're here? Haven't things changed for you, too?
strictdiscipline: (103)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2017-04-30 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course. I'm not the same person I was over a year ago.

[Even so—]

The tasks I've set for myself haven't changed. My job is to protect those who can't protect themselves, and to fight for a future that's better than what we have now.

[A terribly vague answer, she knows, bu it's different with every world they travel to.]

Perhaps that's not be what you consider to be a soldier but that is what I am here to do.
secondnature: (hm that's a good question)

[personal profile] secondnature 2017-05-02 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
It just doesn't sound like it's any different from what I do.

[The vagueness is there, but Keith definitely understands the flexibility of the missions, especially when combined with his paladin experience.

After all, he went into a giant space worm's digestive track before. And that was to help them protect the universe!]


So I guess my question is: how is your viewpoint different? Is it because this is all duty for you?