佐々木 琲世 (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ex_adept136) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
futurology2017-04-25 08:10 pm
ex_adept136) wrote in futurology2017-04-25 08:10 pm
text | un: Sasaki
[Haise has talked with several teammates about the lack of cohesion, and how difficult it is for all of them to coordinate. It was something he'd meant to discuss, or perhaps encourage others better suited, to bring up when they had some down-time. In the wake of a rather heated debate he chose to sat out on, he thinks maybe conversations about how they unify can't wait]
It seems that some of us may be feeling a little hot under the collar after recent events. Since I am an advocate for mercy, and am only alive because as much was extended to me when others may have argued against it, I don't want to touch on moral disagreements. Our stances will naturally differ, because our organization doesn't give us any unifying principles to abide by.
As a member of the CCG, I had very set guidelines to follow. Those weren't all things I agreed with, or felt right about. But they did maintain order, and did keep people safe. They made us an effective team, and more than once it's come up with colleagues here that we might benefit from that.
This was something I'd hoped might come up on Oska, when people had time to relax, but considering the circumstances...
Would any of you be interested in opening that discussion? That is, talking about our backgrounds, where we're coming from, and what we believe. If we start there, surely we can find a way to work together. If we're constantly at odds with one another, that isn't good for anyone. When I first joined, that division was certainly in place, but those I disagreed with still took the time to speak with me, and we did have common ground. I'd like to suggest that, as a team, we try to find that...for all our sakes.
Edit: Although I spoke of my own background in the example I provided, by no means am I suggesting that everyone do the same. Most importantly, we need to establish where we stand on issues we're often confronted with in our line of work. These things would inevitably show in our actions, so speaking on personal matters is not necessary for discussion.
What each of us believes and what course we're inclined to take is what I mean to inquire about.
[ooc: Naturally, thread-hop/jack as desired]
It seems that some of us may be feeling a little hot under the collar after recent events. Since I am an advocate for mercy, and am only alive because as much was extended to me when others may have argued against it, I don't want to touch on moral disagreements. Our stances will naturally differ, because our organization doesn't give us any unifying principles to abide by.
As a member of the CCG, I had very set guidelines to follow. Those weren't all things I agreed with, or felt right about. But they did maintain order, and did keep people safe. They made us an effective team, and more than once it's come up with colleagues here that we might benefit from that.
This was something I'd hoped might come up on Oska, when people had time to relax, but considering the circumstances...
Would any of you be interested in opening that discussion? That is, talking about our backgrounds, where we're coming from, and what we believe. If we start there, surely we can find a way to work together. If we're constantly at odds with one another, that isn't good for anyone. When I first joined, that division was certainly in place, but those I disagreed with still took the time to speak with me, and we did have common ground. I'd like to suggest that, as a team, we try to find that...for all our sakes.
Edit: Although I spoke of my own background in the example I provided, by no means am I suggesting that everyone do the same. Most importantly, we need to establish where we stand on issues we're often confronted with in our line of work. These things would inevitably show in our actions, so speaking on personal matters is not necessary for discussion.
What each of us believes and what course we're inclined to take is what I mean to inquire about.
[ooc: Naturally, thread-hop/jack as desired]
no subject
i thought u were done with me, bro
what a waste of a flounce
anyway let's be real here, you just demonstrated exactly why this voyeuristic shitshow is useless
u kno how there's that saying, the road to hell's paved with good intentions
that's u my dude
"trying to help" are like ur magic words that justifies everything u do and makes ur ideas above criticism, and anyone who disagrees is unhelpful or a cold heartless bastard or [insert insult of choice here]
we could all be bleeding out on the grounds of oska and with ur last breath u'll STILL say "we were just trying to help"
no subject
Here's the difference between me and you: when I TRY, I succeed a lot of the time.
When you point out people aren't doing things the right way, you just want to forget that we're all PEOPLE with actual desires and feelings.
The good thing is that I know that I'm better than you.
[Arrogance has always been one of Keith's ... well, no one would call it a good thing, but he's feeding into it right now.]
no subject
for someone who thinks he's all that, u sure have a thin skin if you think criticism is the same as calling u stupid lmao
got some issues we're projecting here, bro?
anyway, since ur memory's apparently on the fritz (or u just like to arrange life in a way that suits u), i actually said that a quarantine was a good idea, just that the way u guys were doing it was likely to get all of u in there killed, because surprise, i actually didn't want u fuckers to die! & thought that was more important than ur ~feelings and desires~
but it didn't! u all survived & didn't cannibalize urselves!
u coasted by on luck!
congratulations, a winner is you (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
except ur not so lucky with the taraxa are u
that's the problem with all u idealists
ur more concerned with what the Morally Correct thing to do is than thinking through what the consequences might be, and because ur also optimists to a fault u assume that everything will work out in the end because of ur Moral Correctness
when it does, like woodhurst, it's evidence that ur way was the best possible way and couldn't have possibly gone wrong or had any negative repercussions
when it doesn't, like with these taraxa, it's not ur fault
one of these days ur gonna get someone u care about killed with that attitude, and all the blame-shifting in the multiverse isn't gonna bring them back
no subject
Anything else I tell you will just be blame shifting, right?
So, let's go with being done. The good thing is that you continue to make suggestions that no one can possibly listen to, so at least I really won't be missing anything from now on.
no subject
lol
have u noticed how every time u disagree with something, it's somehow what The Entire Team Thinks
presumption isn't a good look on u bro
but thanks for re-demonstrating my exact point about why most people aren't gonna be interested in sharing
seeya next time u disagree with me, since u clearly won't be able to help urself
bye~