ex_adept136: (Default)
佐々木 琲世 ([personal profile] ex_adept136) wrote in [community profile] futurology2017-04-25 08:10 pm

text | un: Sasaki

[Haise has talked with several teammates about the lack of cohesion, and how difficult it is for all of them to coordinate. It was something he'd meant to discuss, or perhaps encourage others better suited, to bring up when they had some down-time. In the wake of a rather heated debate he chose to sat out on, he thinks maybe conversations about how they unify can't wait]

It seems that some of us may be feeling a little hot under the collar after recent events. Since I am an advocate for mercy, and am only alive because as much was extended to me when others may have argued against it, I don't want to touch on moral disagreements. Our stances will naturally differ, because our organization doesn't give us any unifying principles to abide by.

As a member of the CCG, I had very set guidelines to follow. Those weren't all things I agreed with, or felt right about. But they did maintain order, and did keep people safe. They made us an effective team, and more than once it's come up with colleagues here that we might benefit from that.

This was something I'd hoped might come up on Oska, when people had time to relax, but considering the circumstances...

Would any of you be interested in opening that discussion? That is, talking about our backgrounds, where we're coming from, and what we believe. If we start there, surely we can find a way to work together. If we're constantly at odds with one another, that isn't good for anyone. When I first joined, that division was certainly in place, but those I disagreed with still took the time to speak with me, and we did have common ground. I'd like to suggest that, as a team, we try to find that...for all our sakes.

Edit: Although I spoke of my own background in the example I provided, by no means am I suggesting that everyone do the same. Most importantly, we need to establish where we stand on issues we're often confronted with in our line of work. These things would inevitably show in our actions, so speaking on personal matters is not necessary for discussion.
What each of us believes and what course we're inclined to take is what I mean to inquire about.


[ooc: Naturally, thread-hop/jack as desired]
secondnature: (maybe it won't be so bad)

[personal profile] secondnature 2017-04-30 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
[Keith does find it odd that he doesn't know about the situation at hand, if only because it sounds like it was a member of Audentes. But he trusts Haise's word that his judgment of the situation is what it is, even if it may not be as it seems. ALASTAIR could, if nothing else, use a lot more resources than what they have at their disposal.

He doesn't think anyone would disagree with that.]


I think the real problem is that the current members of ALASTAIR won't know what happened in the past without some real digging. That includes people on Team Kittypaw. If they had us looking for that before, that means they don't know. They had to learn from that information as much as we did.

When you say orphaned, does that mean they specifically looked for orphans?


[Keith, being an orphan (or so he thinks—he's really not sure these days), figures that's even sketchier than Voltron and ALASTAIR put together.

But that's where judgment comes in to play.]
secondnature: (fireside chat)

[personal profile] secondnature 2017-05-02 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
I wonder if they're afraid of what we'd do with that information. I mean, you don't think it'd be surprising if we got someone who'd be interested in going to Zymandis, right? I don't want to say that it's likely, but it's not unlikely, either. Especially with the way that some people talk around here.

[Maybe he shouldn't be saying this in public, but it is Keith. Besides, he already accused one person of wanting to do that. Might as well ride it out.]

It's good that they don't force the orphans on that path. But it may be a good path for them to take anyway. Going to the Garrison was kinda like that for me, anyway.

[Albeit with less explained fighter pilot stuff. Because why.]
secondnature: (maybe it won't be so bad)

[personal profile] secondnature 2017-05-02 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe not, but how can we know? Besides, isn't there another way to look at it? Back home, the Galra supported their Empire at first because they thought it would help them. I can see someone joining up if they thought it could confirm the safety of their home world.

[Keith has put some amount of thought into this, but it's probably partly because it does sit close to home.]

It's different. I mean, I guess some people become teachers, but most end up there to participate in space exploration. And most people have bigger support networks than I ever had.
secondnature: (i watch new girl!)

[personal profile] secondnature 2017-05-03 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
[Keith realizes this is where he and Haise differ. He trusts in the bulk of their teammates, but not everyone. Maybe that's because he doesn't know them.

Then again, isn't having faith in ALASTAIR the same? Keith is beginning to think that his theory is really the issue here.]


It might be something simpler than what we're saying. Maybe teams get disbanded early on. But ours has lasted long enough to be a known entity. I haven't been transferred to another team to know if they know stuff already, you know?

[Keith realizes that Pidge might know. Hm. Well, it's not that important.]

The Garrison had a lot of people, but the expeditions were smaller. It was all about resources. There would be a fighter who also excelled in piloting and two scientifically-geared minded people on each mission.

I was obviously the pilot type. I never went on a mission. Not before I had to leave the Garrison.