Catherine Chun (
arkproject) wrote in
futurology2018-04-24 05:44 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
c.chun ➤ 001 ➤ text
Hi, everyone. I'm Catherine!
I've been talking to a few people about our mission, and I've been thinking... Do we have any ideas for how to restructure the government that don't require full-scale fighting? Like, if we could gather evidence of the corruption and expose it to the public, through, say... cyber espionage? It would at least give us more information, even if we don't go that route.
Reconnaissance is a good first step!
I'm not an expert in this, but I figure one of you is. So I want your thoughts! Or if you have experience hacking and want to teach me. It sounds like it would be easier to sneak in and put a physical receiver into one of their central systems, but in the spirit of keeping our options open, I might as well learn.
Even if doing it the manual way is going to be very slow.
I've been talking to a few people about our mission, and I've been thinking... Do we have any ideas for how to restructure the government that don't require full-scale fighting? Like, if we could gather evidence of the corruption and expose it to the public, through, say... cyber espionage? It would at least give us more information, even if we don't go that route.
Reconnaissance is a good first step!
I'm not an expert in this, but I figure one of you is. So I want your thoughts! Or if you have experience hacking and want to teach me. It sounds like it would be easier to sneak in and put a physical receiver into one of their central systems, but in the spirit of keeping our options open, I might as well learn.
Even if doing it the manual way is going to be very slow.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I know what violent revolution is like. I'll pass.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I intend to follow a path of propaganda. It feels like the safest bet for me.
But what you've outlined here can be a resource in a different way.
no subject
2B brought up that we could look for the location of any missing people who were detained rather than executed. That's the kind of thing I'm good at, and that we could find in their systems.
no subject
Not that the jailed people are out of the question. That's outside of my wheelhouse currently.
no subject
Maybe this post didn't make it transparently obvious, but I'm not very good with people.
no subject
So—consider me the "good at people" type. Believe it or not, that means not hurting people, but we have to keep in mind that the Rost are people, too. They aren't inclined toward violence without provocation.
no subject
Great, then you can do that part. I don't have anything against the Rost-- I don't want them to get hurt, either. I don't blame anyone for whatever choices they make. It's just what I said: I have to do what I can live with after, and everyone else should do the same.
[ After a moment, she hesitantly adds: ] I'm glad Simon made friends here. I was wondering how he'd do outside of PATHOS-II. I didn't think we'd ever leave.
no subject
[That's the first half of her response. It's not that Veronica is trying to be condescending. It's just that she's come across this before with the team. She's someone who likes to play mediator (or "manage people," if it's put less kindly) so that people don't get ahead of themselves.]
It's a good thing he's here. It's a good thing you're here, too. That place sounded like a nightmare. No matter how bad missions get, at least it's not that.
no subject
I'm not trying to introduce transparency because I'm naive, and I'm not trying to go around Rost. I want them to succeed. But I bet they aren't the first ones to try this, and we should find out what happened to the people that did before, that no one knows to speak of.
As for PATHOS-II, it was my home for a long time. It wasn't always that bad. I'm glad I left, but I'm still going to miss it. Simon only knew it as a nightmare, so I get it, but that's not how I remember it.
no subject
What happened to the others is probably simpler than you think: it's in the dossier. They got put down. They might even be dead.
[Veronica chooses not to touch the subject of PATHOS-II. It's not her place to remark upon it. It might be a noticeable lapse, but she knows where her commentary is suddenly unwelcome or unwarranted. The mission is one thing. Their lives prior to this is another.]
no subject
It still bothers her. So she resorts to being professional. ]
Sorry, I probably wasn't clear. Like I said, if you want to handle dealing with the dissemination of any information I find, that's fine with me. I'm not at all qualified to handle that. Tell Rost whatever you think is wise.
Failed attempts are still useful information. [ That's the whole basis of science, after all. ] It'll help us know what not to try, at the bare minimum. I want to see what I can find.
no subject
We have a resource. No matter how much you're bad at people, you need to communicate with them. The Rost have more together than we could ever have, and they know whether your plan is useful.
I'm not concerned with information dissemination. I'm concerned with making sure people aren't afraid so that they can improve their circumstances.
no subject
For the record, I'm already planning on working with the Rost. I just don't want to hand over assassination targets. I already said that. I don't know how to say it any clearer.
no subject
We require the same tools.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'll ask around and see what I can dig up on that front.
no subject
My backup plan is to put together a small team to sneak in and install a wireless receiver so I don't need to hack into anything. But that's obviously more risky.
no subject
Especially if you can make sure it looks like it belongs.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)