daimeinashi: (pic#8603083)
サイ sᴀɪ ([personal profile] daimeinashi) wrote in [community profile] futurology2016-10-09 03:03 am

text; un: sai

[Sai hasn't entirely worked out how to use this whole magic jewelry network thing yet, but the thought-typing is relatively straightforward enough. So:]

is it truly wise to be rescuing the qorral ?
should a significant number of them perish, it will be far easier to complete our secondary mission of stopping the mining efforts
strictdiscipline: (014)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-10-12 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
[She waits, and listens when he speaks again. Even with the detail given, she can't fully understand his frame of mind, nor can she begin to understand the type of person that would raise someone so callously as to disregard human life as a whole.

(Because surely this must be a learned behavior rather than something inborn?)]


We're not that different here. We have bonds we also wish to preserve, our own goals that we wish to pursue outside of mission parameters. I don't imagine the Qorral are much different either, in their ways of thinking and the relationships they make.

[With that said...]

People will die, regardless of what we do. But part of being human [or Qorral, she supposes] is having a right to live, to have the time to form those bonds.

[She doesn't expect him to understand though, if he hadn't thus far. Though it makes her wonder..]

You've spent all your life believing you were nothing more than a weapon?

[How had he put it....a blade?]
strictdiscipline: (007)

groans i'm so sorry, work ate me

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-10-22 08:49 am (UTC)(link)
[The easy answer, given with only the barest hint of amusement:]

With a lot of difficulty.

[But that doesn't go particularly far by way of explanation, which it seems he needs more than anything else. If she could understand the thoughts going through his mind, perhaps it would be easier to explain, lay each piece out one by one. But she doesn't, and so forthcoming responses come slower as she tries to puzzle out how best to cover this topic.]

Even within all those bonds, people still prioritize some over others. They have to; it's impossible to protect everyone. That doesn't mean we [general we here, not literally every single person on team Audentes] don't try to protect as many as we can when the occasion arises and when there are no other conflicts of interest, but such a thing isn't always possible.

[Are things still confusing? Probably.]

It takes a long time to learn. Some people never do, or willingly choose not to.
strictdiscipline: (004)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-10-27 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
It is. [Most of them are, tbh.] To a certain extent, all things in life are a conflict of interest.

[But she's never been particularly good at philosophy, or moral debate. All she knows is what she's experienced, and those experiences are not ones she can simply pass to another person.]

If this is something you want to discuss deeper, it might be best to find another conversation partner.
strictdiscipline: (014)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-11-05 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)
[Maybe he'll get that out of her one day. For now, it seems like he has enough on his plate to deal with. She's apologetic, but that doesn't carry so well through text.]

Riza Hawkeye. [Her name, that is, in case it wasn't clear.] If you'd like to talk some other time, you can message me.
strictdiscipline: (019)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-11-05 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
[Finally, someone who uses their name as their network username. (It's been surprisingly uncommon, or so she's found.)]

Either. I can't claim to be very good at ethics, but if you can't find anyone else willing to speak on the topic, I can do my best.

[But somehow she doubts he won't find anyone else. Nalawi had been in a disaster in every way, after all.]
strictdiscipline: (017)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-11-05 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
[is this a real discussion she's having right now....]

For the moment. Sometimes people choose to table conversations for a variety of reasons.

Have you always discussed every one of your concerns in one sitting?
strictdiscipline: (014)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-11-06 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
There is always room to dissent, if you feel the need.

Whether or not the other person is willing to listen is another story entirely.
strictdiscipline: (017)

[personal profile] strictdiscipline 2016-11-12 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Then consider it possible now.

Though you may not always receive the response you expect.


[See: probably this entire post.]