text | UN: A$HMON3Y

[moneyballer]

ay yo ladieeeeez 😜 hay hay hAY hayyyyyy ✋✋✋ if any of u girly gals need a STUDMUFFIN ✔️✔️✔️✔️ 2 help sell the whole baws asssz upper class B I A T C H than g thang thaaaaang 💁 dis boi got an 🍑 dat won't quit and a lotta lurve ❤️❤️❤️ 4 his new teamies so holla atcho homie if u need a little man 🍭 hangin around while u strut ur stuff

*and PS NO 🐵 bidness, i'm taken, ok? yee thnk u

skeet skeet

Comments

[unholey]

[Does it really count as thwarted if it's just been briefly misdirected...]

It's ok. I don't think I have a patience for an interview with him on that subject, so you're safe regardless. Consider the case study cancelled.

Honestly that one is kind of unsettling... the eyes are too big. And they're so glassy. And why is there a flower inside its face? Has this emoticon been parasitized? Is that why the smile is so small? Where did those characters come from I have never seen those before.

[digiorno]

[YES!!!]

What? No it isn't. The flower isn't inside its face, it's tucked into its hair. Stop overanalyzing it, it's a good one!

Here how about this:

(◠‿◠✿)

[unholey]

Oh. So the parantheses are hair? Got it. That emoticon must have a bob haircut.

That would depend on the message. At the moment: menacing, because I've insulted the previous emoticon's (supposed) cuteness.

[digiorno]

Hmm.

Good, I'll accept menacing. It'll get more menacing if you keep being dubious in parentheses, though. Is that really what you want?