daimeinashi: (pic#8603083)
サイ sᴀɪ ([personal profile] daimeinashi) wrote in [community profile] futurology2016-10-09 03:03 am

text; un: sai

[Sai hasn't entirely worked out how to use this whole magic jewelry network thing yet, but the thought-typing is relatively straightforward enough. So:]

is it truly wise to be rescuing the qorral ?
should a significant number of them perish, it will be far easier to complete our secondary mission of stopping the mining efforts
stickyfingers: (do yoυ only lιĸe тнe eaѕy)

text; un: saccharine

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-10 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I think this is something that's more or less along the lines of 'better in theory than in practice'.

People don't like it when you suggest letting innocents die and all.
stickyfingers: (all мy lιғe ι've waѕтed ғor тнιѕ)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-16 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
[Yeah, it's a pesky word, isn't it Sai? It's real grey, being able to discern between what people were innocent and which weren't, especially on a planet that was in such a mess as this one. But all the same...]

You a military man? It would beg to reason if you can't really see the reason why you'd not let collateral just be collateral. But even if I don't necessary disagree with you, I can easily see why others do.

It's really easy to villianize a guy when he suggests letting people die without trying to help them.

We're not all heroes, sure--but we're also not mindless husks, either. Lotta people would prefer try to prevent loss of life, even if it's not really something that can often be helped.
stickyfingers: @killkinds (тнe arмιeѕ oғ ғaιтнғυl)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-23 04:06 pm (UTC)(link)
We could write a book on it. Big headline. 'Everyone Dies and here's 10000 different ways how'. You're preaching to the choir here, kiddo.

But you start talking like you don't value the lives of others--even strangers--and people are going to start writing you off as a psychopath

And noone wants that, shinobi of konohagakure.
stickyfingers: (yoυ lιe)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-23 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Someone who does stuff without thinking about how it'll harm others. Or purposefully doing cruel things in order to hurt others.

Basically, if someone is considered a 'psychopath', most people don't want anything to do with them. For safety and sanity.
stickyfingers: (do yoυ only lιĸe тнe eaѕy)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-23 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
[Yeah, and this is why you're a perfect shinobi, Sai. Sigh, what a scary thought, man.]

Yeah, you again, have a point. We kill cattle to eat beef, and hunt down grouse to make stew--it's all relative, I guess.

When it comes to hurting other people. Or things that can. You know. Have pragmatic thought, people tend to care more about them. It's an empathy thing.
stickyfingers: (ι aм lead ι can geт dιѕconnecтed)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-23 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Man you ask some pretty deep questions.
But hey I started this, kind of my duty to answer, huh.

It's. You know. Normal.
To see someone suffering and be compelled to help them out?

That's what being empathetic to others is, right?
So.
The Audentes here are seeing the Qorral suffer, so they're compelled to help them.


[God he is not a shounen protag he doesn't know how to answer these questions articulately.]
stickyfingers: (ι aм lead ι can geт dιѕconnecтed)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-23 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
[A hand on his face as he really tries to figure this out. He's met people like Sai before. Military types, who didn't think a damn about the people around them, and saw people as just objects in the way of the 'bigger picture'.

It wasn't exactly a wrong way to think, but there's definitely more than one person around who would say it isn't the right way of thinking either. Gaius being one of them. He can understand Sai's point, he just doesn't agree with it.]


Well, technically we are associated with these people so far as the missions themselves go?
We're here because ALASTAIR wants us to solve the issues they're facing here, right?

On the same thread, wouldn't helping the people out instead of letting them die kind of be ... well, even if we don't exactly have a contract with them or anything...

Agh, I don't know. We're really just starting to talk in circles here, aren't we.
stickyfingers: (don'т cry ғor aυdιence)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-25 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
All I can figure, bud, is that the way most people are gonna' look at it is like this.

Letting them die without trying to help is the same as killing them yourself.

If you can prevent it, you should.

Even if what you say about them being 'incidental' is true.
stickyfingers: (ѕo ѕweeт and coмpleтe)

[personal profile] stickyfingers 2016-10-30 08:10 am (UTC)(link)
...

Alright gonna admit outright, you make a damn brilliant point there.
if there's one thing im not into it's dying for a cause I don't believe in.

But I guess most people would argue that it'd be a death caused by doing the 'right thing' or something along those lines.

...

Yeah there's no point arguing this much, is there.